scubadoc Ten Foot Stop

March 30, 2006

Wait after general anesthesia before diving?

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 7:47 pm

Question:
How long should a patient that was under general anesthesia (knocked out) wait before diving?

Answer:
To some extent, the ability to dive will depend on the diagnosis for which the anesthetic was given and the disability from the surgical procedure will determine when to dive. If one were being put to sleep for some non-debilitating diagnosis (such as dental), my guess would be that there should be no diving for at least 24 hours. Longer periods of diving cessation may be recommended depending on the procedure performed and the presence of complications.

There have been reported long term effects of a general anesthetic decreasing the cognition patients lasting up to 3-4 months postoperatively. This is seen mostly in the elderly (over 60). Studies on rats fail to show any reduction in longevity. However, there are no studies that I can find concerning how soon the patient recovers completely from the blunted sensorium that occurs with every general anesthetic. This would be highly variable and would depend on the length of the operation, intraoperative medications and recovery room problems

Another variable would be the type of preanesthetic medication given and the type of inhalation anesthetic chosen for the procedure. Whether or not becoming saturated with nitrogen (as occurs with most deep dives) would increase the residual effects of the anesthetic is not known, at least I cannot find any studies on this particular situation.

A good thing to do would be to take the recommendations of the US Department of Transportation for driving after an anesthetic and substitute the word dive for drive. These recommendations can be seen at this web site: http://snipurl.com/oeu9 .

Dr.Richard Moon, Duke Anesthesiologist, says that diving should be safe after 48 hours provided the patient is not taking any sedatives (including opiate analgesics). The cause of postoperative cognitive effects is not known, but could be due to the inflammatory response rather than the anesthesia per se.

However, the major determinant is not the anesthetic, but rather the reason for the anesthetic. Diving is a bad idea immediately after surgery irrespective of the anesthetic.

Another anesthesiologist says “all of the modern anesthetics are relatively insoluble and one would expect them to be largely eliminated within minutes after their cessation. This might not be the case with some of the older anesthetics such as diethyl ether which is roughly ten times more soluable in blood. In that case, if diving soon after an anesthetic - one could imagine a diver at depth becoming re-anesthetized. This would likely be facilitated by any concomitant narcotic usage as well.”

So, to summarize - return to diving depends mainly on the type of surgery, the restrictions placed on the patient from the surgical procedure, medications required by the diver and there probably should be a wait between 24-48 hours after the procedure.

Underwater Forensics Research Seminar

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 7:12 pm

Underwater Forensics Research Seminar
Speaker; Mack S. House Jr. Author: “Underwater Forensics Research/Commercial Scientific Diving”
Holliday Inn Express
Albemarle, NC April 8, 2006 From: 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Registration ends April 5,2006
Reservations: Veronica Porras
704-986-2100

Benefits
This seminar is designed to provide informational needs of medical and law enforcement, community through understanding the importance of crime scene investigation of the underwater victim. A model for preparing law enforcement, rescue squads, medical personnel and related fields to meet the needs of community and those directly involved in the recovery process. The importance of human anatomy and post mortem changes will also be provided.

Seminar highlights:
Overview of Underwater Forensics and Safe Diving Practices
Drowning and interpretation of different terminology
Post mortem anatomical changes in a fluid medium (photographs are used in this section)
Preparing reports and documentation of evidence
Authorized “chain of custody” and the importance of HIPAA
The importance of “Debriefing” and psychological considerations

Learning objectives:
The attendee will be able to understand the importance Underwater Forensics and its application in crime scene investigation, human anatomy, preparing court ready reports and documentation protocols.
The attendee will be able to understand the anatomical changes that occur and the importance of crime scene technique.
The attendee will be able to discuss and articulate a model for preparing law enforcement personnel and medical professionals to address the complex needs of this application in crime scene investigation.

Who Should Attend?
This one-day seminar is designed for law enforcement, medical professionals, psychologists, pathologists, counselors, social workers, nurses, case managers, attorneys and related personnel who are or may be involved in this specialized field of crime scene investigation..

Registration includes:
Continental Breakfast
Textbook
Certificate of attendance

March 29, 2006

Problems, Divers With Disabilities

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 9:37 am

We get fairly frequent requests for information concerning diving with various disabling conditions and have generally applied the knowledge known to exist for all divers to the limitations of the particular disability involved. This has in most cases been satisfactory but occasionally we run into a wall of lack of pertinent information, such as the effect of pressure on electronic implants and pumps. Cheng and Diamond published a review of potential problems that they recognized as being important to divers with disabilities in the American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in May of 2005 and the article is paraphrased below.

Cheng J, Diamond M.
SCUBA diving for individuals with disabilities.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 May;84(5):369-75. Review.
http://snipurl.com/o92y

Potential Medical Problems in Divers with Disabilities

Osteoporosis and Fractures
Immobilization and paralysis can place some people with disabilities are at risk for osteoporosis.8,9 Divers at risk for pathologic fractures should seek dive boats with access platforms near water level for easier transfers in and out of the water. It would be rare for dive boats to have lifts that are commonly found in accessible pools. Many neurologic disorders have loss of sensation and fractures may go unrecognized. Unexplained lower limb swelling or redness should be evaluated for possible pathologic fracture.

Medical Implants
Questions are posed concerning the integrity of medical appliances when exposed to the increased barometric pressures associated with SCUBA diving. Many individuals with disabilities such as spina bifida have connections between the brain anf the abdominal cavity (ventriculoperitoneal shunts) for the treatment of hydrocephalus (excessive fluid on the brain). Huang et al.10 subjected four ventriculoperitoneal shunts to one and four atmosphere absolute in a hyperbaric chamber and found that all shunts performed according to manufacturers’ specifications. They reasoned that any increase in pressure will compress all fluid-filled compartments. Therefore, there would be no significant change in gradient between intracranial and intraperitoneal pressures. Preliminary studies have been carried out for cochlear implants in a hyperbaric chamber, illustrating that the implantable components of various cochlear implants can withstand pressures of up to six atmospheres without damage or failure of critical seals.11

Intrathecal baclofen pumps are increasingly being utilized in the management of spasticity and dystonia. Akman et al.12 described a case of retrograde leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into the infusion pump reservoir of an intrathecal baclofen pump (Medtronic SynchroMed, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) during hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Medtronic does not recommend exposing their intrathecal baclofen pumps to pressures of 2 atmospheres absolute (SynchroMed II Technical Manual, Medtronic).

Thermal Regulation
There is an inability to maintain heat regulation in many disabling conditions. For individuals with this deficit, diving should be undertaken in warm water regions and neoprene wetsuits should be utilized. Deeper diving will cause increased compression of the air in neoprene wetsuits. Because a large component of the insulating quality of wetsuits is provided by the air trapped in the material, compression of these garments will decrease their insulating capabilities.13 When diving to greater depths, the need for increased thermal protection should be anticipated due to the compression of neoprene and the much colder water. Peripheral vasoconstriction, as an adaptation to minimize the strain caused by loss of body heat, may compromise circulation to the limbs and may need to be minimized.13 This vasoconstriction may decrease already decreased circulation to the limbs of some individuals with paraplegia. For example, Boot et al.14 found that individuals with spina bifida and spinal cord injury have peripheral arterial vasculature that was of smaller diameter, lower flow, and higher shear stress when compared with controls. These changes may compromise optimal regulation of the peripheral vasculature. For individuals with spinal cord injury at the neurologic level of T6 and above, exposure to cold water may increase sympathetic nervous system activity, inducing or exacerbating autonomic dysreflexia. 15 Development of autonomic dysreflexia at greater depths may become life-threatening. The need for slow ascent and safety stops may prevent the individual from receiving needed medical care quickly. Individuals with spinal cord injury who are at risk for autonomic dysreflexia should be monitored for common symptoms such as headache, vision changes, and flushing.

Atrophy and Hypotrophy
It should be noted that due to atrophy and hypotrophy of the lower limbs associated with paraplegia and tetraplegia and other disorders, regular wetsuits may not fit properly and custom wetsuits may be necessary to ensure proper fit and optimal heat retention. Because of decreased muscle mass in the lower limbs there may be increased buoyancy and ankle weights may be required to gain neutral buoyancy in the lower limbs. Due to increased buoyancy, this may be worsened when a full wetsuit is worn. 7

Cardiovascular Issues
Paraplegics and some amputees must rely on the upper limbs for propulsion and there are some physiologic factors that need to be considered when the upper limbs alone are used for propulsion. Activities performed with the upper limbs compared with the lower limbs require higher myocardial oxygen consumption at the same total oxygen consumption inducing more stress by upper limb propulsion underwater. Cardiac disorders are common with many neurologic and muscular conditions such as the muscular dystrophies/myopathies, Friedreich’s ataxia, and many syndromes. The shift of blood into the central circulation resulting from water immersion may aggravate congestive heart failure.17 There is also increased myocardial demand in diving due to increased exertion.13 In addition, immersion in cold water can also cause a significant increase in metabolic rate.15 Given these potential stresses on the cardiovascular system during diving, cardiac function should be evaluated carefully in those individuals who have documented cardiac disorders or conditions that predispose them to cardiac pathology. The use of webbed gloves can help facilitate propulsion with the upper limbs and disabled divers may also opt for the use of motorized propulsion devices that are available from several manufacturers and utilized by many nondisabled divers as well.

Venous Stasis
Levey et al. investigated the relationship of spina bifida and deep venous thrombosis and speculated that individuals with spina bifida may be at higher risk due to venous insufficiency and lower limb paresis.18 There is no direct evidence that SCUBA diving increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis. But, given the increase in prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in individuals with spina bifida, it would be prudent to monitor closely for signs and symptoms such as lower limb swelling and dyspnea that may suggest deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus.

Decompression Sickness
The brain and spinal cord contain myelin, which is very susceptible to excess nitrogen supersaturation after ascent.17 Symptoms of air embolism affecting the brain or spinal cord include unconsciousness with stroke-like symptoms, paralysis, seizures, bowel/bladder dysfunction, sensory abnormalities, fatigue, personality change, poor concentration, irritability, and changes in vision.17 The cortical gray matter is more efficient at releasing nitrogen compared with the spinal cord.1,19 Therefore, the spinal cord is at particular risk for decompression sickness. Venous bubbles can cause thrombosis of the venous plexus surrounding the spinal cord, resulting in venous stasis and spinal cord ischemia.1 However, there is no direct evidence that individuals with spinal cord dysfunction or cortical neurologic disorders are at greater risk of decompression sickness of the brain or spinal cord. Boot et al.14 found that individuals with spina bifida had common femoral arteries that were smaller, with decreased blood flow, compared with normal controls. It is unknown if these arterial characteristics increase the risk of decompression sickness and there are currently no studies investigating the appropriateness of the use of current dive tables by the disabled population. Individuals with disabilities may be at increased risk in the context of decompression sickness because neurologic impairment caused by the decompression sickness can be confused with or masked by the neurologic signs and symptoms associated with the divers’ disease processes. Therefore, it is very important for the disabled diver and his or her dive companions to be familiar the signs and symptoms of decompression sickness and be able to contrast them with the disabled individual’s baseline state.

Seizure
Many individuals with disabilities have seizure disorders related to their disease processes. Any seizure underwater would result in severe drowning risk and would also be a danger to that diver’s partner. Therefore, seizure disorder requiring ongoing medical management is a strict contraindication to SCUBA diving.17,20 Some certifying agencies, however, will allow divers who have been seizure-free without medications for 5 yrs to participate in their diving programs.

Pneumothorax
Pneumothorax can be spontaneous or result from trauma. Spontaneous pneumothorax can be associated with structural abnormalities and lung disease.21 It is a strict contraindication for SCUBA diving because the underlying cause may still be present at the time of diving.20 Many individuals who have disabilities resulting from traumatic events have had pneumothoraces. Traumatic pneumothorax, however, is not a contraindication provided that the injury is well healed.

Latex
Latex allergy is rare in the general population, with a prevalence of 1%.22 However, it is a concern for individuals with spina bifida and other disorders.22–25 Latex allergy is very common in these populations, with up to 60% of individuals with spina bifida having allergies to latex.25 It is an immunoglobulin E–mediated hypersensitivity reaction to natural rubber latex that can result in urticaria, rhinitis, bronchospasm, and anaphylaxis.23 Bernardini et al.25 found that 25% of subjects with spina bifida had latex sensitization, and only 33% of those individuals have had clinical reactions to latex. Although severe reactions are rare, such reactions at greater depths would present a life-threatening event. Therefore, previous screening is important. Individuals at risk for latex allergies, especially people with spina bifida, may wish to consult an allergist for skin prick or serum latex-specific immunoglobulin E antibody testing before considering SCUBA diving. Those individuals who are at risk may wish to have antihistamines and intramuscular epinephrine available in case of a serious reaction. It may also be prudent to contact the manufacturers of the equipment to be used to determine the precise material content to further decrease the risk. The majority of modern diving masks and snorkels are made from silicone. Also, there is usually no natural latex in neoprene wetsuits. However, certain seals and tubing may contain latex, as may seams in certain wetsuits. Latex seals are much more common in dry suits in which water-tight seals are required. Wetsuits manufactured from neoprene rarely have latex seals. Air tubing may contain natural latex, but the latex is usually vulcanized with other materials and therefore would not likely cause a hypersensitivity reaction. However, it may be best to contact individual manufacturers to confirm the latex content in their air hoses. Alternatively, silicone tubing can be utilized to further reduce the risk.

Skin
Many conditions resulting in paraplegia are also associated with sensory deficits. Because of insensate skin, these individuals are at risk for developing pressure ulcers and injuries from trauma. Muscle atrophy also results in decreased protection normally afforded by muscle mass and therefore increases the risk of pressure ulcers. In addition, these individuals are at risk for unrecognized burns from sun exposure. Wetsuits may provide a certain level of protection from skin injury. During the dive, they may protect from abrasions and lacerations while preventing sunburn while on the surface.

Bladder Management
Water immersion and cold exposure have been found to cause diuresis by increasing plasma volume and increasing the release of factors such as atrial natriuretic peptide.26,27 Changes in urine production can become a factor in individuals requiring catheterization because of a neurogenic bladder. Individuals whose bladder programs include clean intermittent catheterization may be required to catheterize more often to address the increased diuresis. This may be difficult given the limited space of a dive boat. It would be an important consideration to identify dive boats that have private spaces available for bladder management and a means of washing hands to maintain the aseptic nature of the procedure. Individuals who are on clean intermittent catheterization programs may regularly limit their intake of fluids to reduce the frequency of catheterizations throughout the day. While SCUBA diving, the sources of fluid loss as previously described and those associated with increased exertion and ambient temperature may predispose the diver to dehydration. In addition, wetsuits provide significant thermal protection while in the water. However, prolonged wetsuit wearing may result in hyperthermia, increased sweat production, and dehydration. 13 Therefore, careful monitoring of fluid intake and output balance and monitoring for symptoms of dehydration are very important in this population. Also, bladder distention can be of particular concern for spinal cord–injured patients with a neurologic level above T6 who are at risk for autonomic dysreflexia.

Ear Barotrauma
Problems associated with middle-ear spaces and paranasal sinuses are the largest source of morbidity among SCUBA divers.20 As a diver descends, external pressure increases and pushes on the tympanic membrane. This pressure needs to be equalized in the middle ear through the oropharynx via the eustachian tube.17 Equalization involves forcefully exhaling against closed (pinched off) nares. Inability to properly equalize will cause barotrauma and may result in pain, acute hemorrhagic otitis media, or tympanic membrane rupture. 17,20,28 Therefore, before diving, each individual should be evaluated for the ability to perform this maneuver independently or with the assistance of another diver.

Asthma
Asthma affects 6–7% of the general population in the United States, often with childhood onset.17 Some have supported that any history of asthma is a strict contraindication.20 However, asthma varies greatly in severity and in its triggers across individuals. 3 Bove17 states that individuals with mild asthma should not be prohibited from diving. Neuman et al.3 suggests that individuals with normal airway function at rest with little airway reactivity to exercise or cold air inhalation may have risks of pulmonary barotrauma similar to nonasthmatic individuals. However, air-trapping at depth while breathing compressed air in individuals with asthma can lead to serious pulmonary barotrauma. 3,29 Therefore, subjects with a history of asthma should be screened carefully. Additional research may be helpful to better describe the risks for different asthma severities and triggers as opposed to using a history of asthma as a strict contraindication for diving.

Certification
Certifying bodies for recreational SCUBA diving such as the Professional Association of Diving Instructors and the National Association of Underwater Instructors have requirements for swimming and fitness. For example, Professional Association of Diving Instructors requires that an individual be able to tread water for 10 mins and swim for 200 meters independently, even though these skills are rarely needed in SCUBA diving. The authors advocate that for full certification, individuals with disabilities should be held to the same requirements and standards as their able-bodied peers. This is to ensure the highest level of safety for the disabled diver. In addition, an important component of SCUBA certification is the ability to perform skills necessary to assist a dive partner. Any disabled individual who is to be a candidate for full certification should be able to carry out these responsibilities. The Handicapped SCUBA Association has established a hierarchical certification structure based on each diver’s abilities. This system allows individuals with disabilities to participate in SCUBA diving at different levels of independence based on their level of function (Table 1).7

CONCLUSIONS
SCUBA diving is an adventurous sport that allows participants to explore a diverse, exciting marine environment. Guidelines have been established by SCUBA certification organizations to minimize injury and injuries often occur when these guidelines are violated. However, some individuals may experience injury even when diving conservatively. Mortality rates in recreational SCUBA diving are estimated to be one to nine in 100,000 divers.1,2,30 The authors advocate that SCUBA diving be made available to as many interested individuals as possible. It can be a great source of self discovery and a means of building confidence and independence. However, individuals with disabilities present with many medical conditions that need to be considered carefully by their physicians before certifying them as fit to dive. Recognizing and addressing risk factors can help to limit morbidity and mortality. Additional research into how the unique anatomy and physiology of individuals with disabilities interact with a hyperbaric, marine environment would help to better refine guidelines and allow safer diving in the least restrictive framework.

TABLE Levels of certification available from the Handicapped SCUBA Association
Level A
Able to provide equal assistance to a fellow diver in case of an emergency. Qualified to dive with another certified diver, including a level A diver.

Level B
Able to care for self in case of an emergency but cannot provide a fellow diver equal assistance in case of an emergency. Qualified to dive with two certified divers who may be level A.

Level C
Able to safely use SCUBA underwater but unable to effectively care for self or a fellow diver in case of an emergency. Must dive with two certified divers, one of whom has been trained by a nationally recognized diver training agency in diver rescue. In most cases, this would be an instructor, assistant instructor, or dive master.

REFERENCES
1. DeGorordo A, Vallejo-Manzur F, Chanin K, et al: Diving emergencies. Resuscitation 2003;59:171–80
2. Spira A: Diving and marine medicine review part II: Diving diseases. J Travel Med 1999;6:180–98
3. Neuman TS, Bove AA, O’Connor RD, et al: Asthma and diving. Ann Allergy 1994;73:344–50
4. Pelletier JP: Recognizing sport diving injuries. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2002;21:26–7
5. Frankel H: Aqualung diving for the paralysed. Paraplegia 1975;13:128–32
6. Williamson JA, McDonald FW, Galligan EA, et al: Selection and training of disabled persons for scuba-diving: Medical and psychological aspects. Med J Aust 1984;141:414–8
7. Madorsky JG, Madorsky AG: Scuba diving: Taking the wheelchair out of wheelchair sports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69(3 pt 1):215–8
8. Chan YY, Bishop NJ: Clinical management of childhood osteoporosis. Int J Clin Pract 2002;56:280–6
9. Apkon SD: Osteoporosis in children who have disabilities. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2002;13:839–55
10. Huang ET, Hardy KR, Stubbs JM, et al: Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt performance under hyperbaric conditions. Undersea Hyperb Med 2000;27:191–4
11. Backous DD, Dunford RG, Segel P, et al: Effects of hyperbaric exposure on the integrity of the internal components of commercially available cochlear implant systems. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:463–7; discussion, 467
12. Akman MN, Loubser PG, Fife CE, et al: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: Implications for spinal cord injury patients with intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps. Case report. Paraplegia 1994;32:281–4
13. Doubt TJ: Cardiovascular and thermal responses to SCUBA diving. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:581–6
14. Boot CR, van Langen H, Hopman MT: Arterial vascular properties in individuals with spina bifida. Spinal Cord 2003;41:242–6
15. Sramek P, Simeckova M, Jansky L, et al: Human physiological responses to immersion into water of different temperatures. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000;81:436–42
16. Braddom R: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ed 2. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000
17. Bove AA: Medical aspects of sport diving. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996;28:591–5
18. Levey EB, Kinsman KF, Kinsman SL: Deep venous thrombosis in individuals with spina bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002;12(suppl 1):S35–6
19. Barratt DM, Harch PG, Van Meter K: Decompression illness in divers: A review of the literature. Neurologist 2002;8: 186–202
20. Dembert ML, Keith JF III: Evaluating the potential pediatric scuba diver. Am J Dis Child 1986;140:1135–41
21. Noppen M: Management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2003;9:272–5
22. Turjanmaa K, Makinen-Kiljunen S: Latex allergy: Prevalence, risk factors, and cross-reactivity. Methods 2002;27: 10–4
23. Mazon A, Nieto A, Linana JJ, et al: Latex sensitization in children with spina bifida: Follow-up comparative study after two years. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84: 207–10
24. Hochleitner BW, Menardi G, Haussler B, et al: Spina bifida as an independent risk factor for sensitization to latex. J Urol 2001;166:2370 –3; discussion, 2373–4
25. Bernardini R, Novembre E, Lombardi E, et al: Risk factors for latex allergy in patients with spina bifida and latex sensitization. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29:681–6
26. Hope A, Aanderud L, Aakvaag A: Dehydration and body fluid-regulating hormones during sweating in warm (38 degrees C) fresh- and seawater immersion. J Appl Physiol 2001;91:1529–34
27. Nakamitsu S, Sagawa S, Miki K, et al: Effect of water temperature on diuresis-natriuresis: AVP, ANP, and urodilatin during immersion in men. J Appl Physiol 1994;77: 1919–25
28. Newton HB: Neurologic complications of scuba diving. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:2211–8
29. Orlowski JP: Adolescent drownings: Swimming, boating, diving, and scuba accidents. Pediatr Ann 1988;17:125– 8, 131–2
30. Morgan WP: Anxiety and panic

Hope this is helpful!

scubadoc

March 28, 2006

Certifying examination in Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 11:33 am

Lisa Wasdin with the UHMS sends the following information about the Board certification dates:

The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) and the American Board of Preventive Medicine (ABPM) will administer the Certifying examination in Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine

ABPM EXAM DATES: October 2-6 and October 9-13

CHANGES for the 2006 Application Cycle:
* The exam will be offered over a two week period at Pearson Professional Centers. The dates for 2006 are: October 2-6 and October 9-13.

* The application deadline is still JUNE 1, but residency pathway applicants will now be allowed to complete requirements up to 15 business days prior to the first day of the examination. For example, a resident who will not complete the practicum year requirement until September 1, 2006 will be allowed to sit for the 2006 exam, rather than wait until 2007, as long as they submit the application by June 1 and all appropriate documentations by September 11.

* The Core examination has been reduced from 175 questions to 150 questions.

* The online application fee and examination fee can now be paid by credit card.
MORE INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND ON THE ABPM WEBSITE: www.abprevmed.org

Guidelines for Recreational Diving with Diabetes - Summary Form

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 10:22 am

We have placed the following summary of guidelines for recreational diving with diabetes recommended by UHMS/DAN workshop on our web site at http://www.scuba-doc.com/endmet.html#Diabetes_and_Diving.
(Proceedings of the UHMS/DAN 2005 June 19 Workshop. Durham, NC:Divers Alert Network; 2005.)

Table 1: Guidelines for Recreational Diving with Diabetes - Summary Form 1
Selection and Surveillance
• Age ≥18 years (16 years if in special training program)
• Delay diving after start/change in medication
- 3 months with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA)
- 1 year after initiation of insulin therapy
• No episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia requiring intervention from a third party for at
least one year
• No history of hypoglycemia unawareness
• HbA1c ≤9% no more than one month prior to initial assessment and at each annual review
- values >9% indicate the need for further evaluation and possible modification of therapy
• No significant secondary complications from diabetes
• Physician/Diabetologist should carry out annual review and determine that diver has good
understanding of disease and effect of exercise
- in consultation with an expert in diving medicine, as required
• Evaluation for silent ischemia for candidates >40 years of age
- after initial evaluation, periodic surveillance for silent ischemia can be in accordance with
accepted local/national guidelines for the evaluation of diabetics
• Candidate documents intent to follow protocol for divers with diabetes and to cease diving and
seek medical review for any adverse events during diving possibly related to diabetes
Scope of Diving
• Diving should be planned to avoid
- depths >100 fsw (30 msw)
- durations >60 minutes
- compulsory decompression stops
- overhead environments (e.g., cave, wreck penetration)
- situations that may exacerbate hypoglycemia (e.g., prolonged cold and arduous dives)
• Dive buddy/leader informed of diver’s condition and steps to follow in case of problem
• Dive buddy should not have diabetes
Glucose Management on the Day of Diving
• General self-assessment of fitness to dive
• Blood glucose (BG) ≥150 mg·dL -1 (8.3 mmol·L -1 ), stable or rising, before entering the water
- complete a minimum of three pre-dive BG tests to evaluate trends
 60 minutes, 30 minutes and immediately prior to diving
- alterations in dosage of OHA or insulin on evening prior or day of diving may help
• Delay dive if BG
- 300 mg·dL -1 (16.7 mmol·L -1 )
• Rescue medications
- carry readily accessible oral glucose during all dives
- have parenteral glucagon available at the surface
• If hypoglycemia noticed underwater, the diver should surface (with buddy), establish positive
buoyancy, ingest glucose and leave the water
• Check blood sugar frequently for 12-15 hours after diving
• Ensure adequate hydration on days of diving
• Log all dives (include BG test results and all information pertinent to diabetes management) 1 For full text see: Pollock NW, Uguccioni DM, Dear GdeL, eds. Diabetes and recreational diving:guidelines for the future. Proceedings of the UHMS/DAN 2005 June 19 Workshop. Durham, NC: Divers Alert Network; 2005.

Donna Uguccioni joins DAN’s Renée Duncan and Betty Orr on the Women’s Dive Hall of Fame

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 10:12 am

Donna Uguccioni, DAN dive physiologist and research coordinator, has been named to the Women’s Dive Hall of Fame (WDHOF). She received the honor at Beneath the Sea 2006 at a meeting of the WDHOF.

Dan Orr, DAN President and CEO, commended the naming of Uguccioni. “Donna has been a major contributor to our research effort and certainly deserves the recognition as a member of the Women Divers Hall of Fame,” Orr said. “We, here at DAN, are all proud of her accomplishments.”

A DAN Member since 1992, Uguccioni is the safety organization’s dive physiologist and research coordinator. She has conducted research on women and diving for DAN; she has coordinated the DAN diabetes and diving project (1997-2000); she co-coordinated the DAN/UHMS Diabetes and Diving Workshop at UHMS (2005); she co-edited the DAN/UHMS Diabetes and Diving Workshop Proceedings (2005)).

Added Richard Vann, Ph.D., DAN Vice President for Research: “We are really pleased for Donna to receive this honor which she earned through her fine work in the office, in the field, and in the chamber, all toward improving the safety of all divers.”

She conducts the DAN Research Internship Program (2000-2006); contributes to and co-edits DAN Annual Diving Report (1995-2005); she coordinates Project Dive Exploration, which represents all DAN research efforts in the field, including studies of dive professionals, technical diving, seasickness and ear barotraumas.

Uguccioni is a chamber, Doppler and TTE technician for DAN research projects at the Duke Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology.

At DAN, Uguccioni has also written or contributed to numerous abstracts and publications and she has contributed research-based articles to Alert Diver magazine. She becomes the third active staff member to be so named. Renée Duncan and Betty Orr also are members.

Her specialty dive certifications include PADI Advanced, Rescue and Dive Master; TDI Nitrox Diver; and NOAA/NURC Scientific Diver and Dive Master.

Her 10 First Aid certifications include N.C. EMT; PADI Medic First Aid; DAN Oxygen Provider, Oxygen Instructor and Instructor Trainer; NBMHMT Certified Hyperbaric Technician; and International Board Undersea Medicine Diving Medical Technician.

Her professional memberships include:

* Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS)
* Professional Association of Underwater Instructors (PADI)
* American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS)
* Cambrian Foundation (scientific underwater exploration)
* Global Underwater Explorer’s Club (underwater exploration)

March 25, 2006

Costochondral Separation and Diving

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 11:28 am

March 25th, 2006
Costochondral Separation and Diving
From DivemedTFS Newsletter,December 30, 2001

Question from a reader:

After a dive I was removing my wet suit and twisted around to grab my zipper cord and had severe pain in the chest. I was given O2 on the boat with little relief and went to the doctor here in Samoa and was told not to worry. (We do not have a chamber here, but since the doctor told me not to worry, I basically tried to put it out my head).

The general pain to touch subsided after a couple of days, but an ache continued to bother me. The pain evolved into a strange combination of pains during the day. At night when I lay down, it eases up. Now, after three months of enduring all of this uneasiness in my chest, I am worried that the injury was actually related to the dive (not the act of taking off the wetsuit). I am currently feeling a general tightness around the upper right chest area, sometimes it feels like nerve pain stretching towards my shoulder from my chest, oftentimes, the pain extends to
my back and is quite uncomfortable beside and below my right shoulder blade. Massage
seems to help, but the pain soon returns.

I also sometimes have a strange tingling throughout the area below where the collarbone attaches to the chest, it feels like something is in my throat, sometimes almost a hot sensation with a taste. I have been on an acid inhibitor (nexium), so I don’t believe it is coming from my stomach. I have seen a doctor here in Samoa, but he doesn’t know much about dive medicine. I am a male, 41 years old and generally quite healthy and I stay in shape. This injury has become rather debilitating and I would like to try to do something about it. I would like some advice.
Thank you for your time.

Answer:
Answers to questions are for information only, do not imply diagnosis or treatment and should always be used in conjunction with the advice of an examining physician.

What you are describing is probably ’sternocostal or costochondral separation’, an injury that is seen fairly frequently with trauma situations but not often associated with wet suit removal. It is not serious but is difficult to diagnose or see on x-ray or other diagnostic methods and often is a diagnosis of exclusion.

The fact that it is associated with movement and pressure seems to rule out serious internal problems such as pulmonary problems, but it would be wise to have yourself checked for coronary artery disease.

One would have to agree that it most likely is not related to your dives. The condition can cause prolonged severe pain as you have noted and can often last for months. Pain syndromes can also be markedly worsened by anxiety of the unknown and one would suspect that this is having a part to play in your situation.

Here is another letter about the same subject:
I recently suffered chest pain in my right side after crashing on roller skates with my daughter (long story, but I had to prevent the 4-year-old from getting squashed). I landed on my right side with right arm stretched over my shoulder. Later in the evening (not immediately), I began to experience muscular-type pain at the interior edge of my ribcage, approximately 2″ below the sternum. I went to the doctor, and chest xrays were negative for cracks/fractures. 600mg of Ibuprofen taken a few times a day helps, but after a couple of days without, the pain begins to return. The pain is low grade with occasional sharp pain, no coughing, voice changes or shortness of breath. The injury appeared to get better, but my weight training seemed to aggrevate it. Therefore, I have rested it for over a month, but the low grade pain lingers.

While this has not impacted normal life, I have not been able to lift weights/exercise for our dive team. I’m still in good shape, but do not want to get too far gone before resuming. Based upon what I’ve read, I believe I either have a bruise, rib separation, or perhaps a cartilege stretch/tear.
I would very much appreciate information or websites that might contain information on such injuries so I might be able to accelerate the rehab. I’ve heard soft tissue rib injuries are some of the worst for rehab, but I’m willing to help the process in anyway possible. I’ve also wondered if an MRI might help diagnose the problem, or if that would even affect the recommendations.

Answer:
From your history provided this sounds like a costochondral separation, although an undisplaced rib fracture is possible. Rib fractures can take a long time to clear up (four to six weeks) and costochondral separations can take twice as long. You might want to be sure that you don’t have some other internal injury, such as liver damage (right side). It would probably ease your mind - if not your pain - to see a physician and be sure.

Here are some links:
http://www.ncemi.org/cse/cse0502.htm
http://www.cc.cc.ca.us/sportsmedicine/chest_injuries.htm

Costochondral Separation and Diving

Filed under: Questions From Newslettersscubadoc @ 11:23 am

Costochondral Separation and Diving
From DivemedTFS Newsletter,December 30, 2001
http://scuba-doc.com/archdec3001.pdf

Question from a reader:

After a dive I was removing my wet suit and twisted around to grab my zipper cord and had severe pain in the chest. I was given O2 on the boat with little relief and went to the doctor here in Samoa and was told not to worry. (We do not have a chamber here, but since the doctor told me not to worry, I basically tried to put it out my head).

The general pain to touch subsided after a couple of days, but an ache continued to bother me. The pain evolved into a strange combination of pains during the day. At night when I lay down, it eases up. Now, after three months of enduring all of this uneasiness in my chest, I am worried that the injury was actually related to the dive (not the act of taking off the wetsuit). I am currently feeling a general tightness around the upper right chest area, sometimes it feels like nerve pain stretching towards my shoulder from my chest, oftentimes, the pain extends to
my back and is quite uncomfortable beside and below my right shoulder blade. Massage
seems to help, but the pain soon returns.

I also sometimes have a strange tingling throughout the area below where the collarbone attaches to the chest, it feels like something is in my throat, sometimes almost a hot sensation with a taste. I have been on an acid inhibitor (nexium), so I don’t believe it is coming from my stomach. I have seen a doctor here in Samoa, but he doesn’t know much about dive medicine. I am a male, 41 years old and generally quite healthy and I stay in shape. This injury has become rather debilitating and I would like to try to do something about it. I would like some advice.
Thank you for your time.

Answer:
Answers to questions are for information only, do not imply diagnosis or treatment and should always be used in conjunction with the advice of an examining physician.

What you are describing is probably ’sternocostal or costochondral separation’, an injury that is seen fairly frequently with trauma situations but not often associated with wet suit removal. It is not serious but is difficult to diagnose or see on x-ray or other diagnostic methods and often is a diagnosis of exclusion.

The fact that it is associated with movement and pressure seems to rule out serious internal problems such as pulmonary problems, but it would be wise to have yourself checked for coronary artery disease.

One would have to agree that it most likely is not related to your dives. The condition can cause prolonged severe pain as you have noted and can often last for months. Pain syndromes can also be markedly worsened by anxiety of the unknown and one would suspect that this is having a part to play in your situation.

Here is another letter about the same subject:
I recently suffered chest pain in my right side after crashing on roller skates with my daughter (long story, but I had to prevent the 4-year-old from getting squashed). I landed on my right side with right arm stretched over my shoulder. Later in the evening (not immediately), I began to experience muscular-type pain at the interior edge of my ribcage, approximately 2″ below the sternum. I went to the doctor, and chest xrays were negative for cracks/fractures. 600mg of Ibuprofen taken a few times a day helps, but after a couple of days without, the pain begins to return. The pain is low grade with occasional sharp pain, no coughing, voice changes or shortness of breath. The injury appeared to get better, but my weight training seemed to aggrevate it. Therefore, I have rested it for over a month, but the low grade pain lingers.

While this has not impacted normal life, I have not been able to lift weights/exercise for our dive team. I’m still in good shape, but do not want to get too far gone before resuming. Based upon what I’ve read, I believe I either have a bruise, rib separation, or perhaps a cartilege stretch/tear.
I would very much appreciate information or websites that might contain information on such injuries so I might be able to accelerate the rehab. I’ve heard soft tissue rib injuries are some of the worst for rehab, but I’m willing to help the process in anyway possible. I’ve also wondered if an MRI might help diagnose the problem, or if that would even affect the recommendations.

Answer:
From your history provided this sounds like a costochondral separation, although an undisplaced rib fracture is possible. Rib fractures can take a long time to clear up (four to six weeks) and costochondral separations can take twice as long. You might want to be sure that you don’t have some other internal injury, such as liver damage (right side). It would probably ease your mind - if not your pain - to see a physician and be sure.

Here are some links:
http://www.ncemi.org/cse/cse0502.htm
http://www.cc.cc.ca.us/sportsmedicine/chest_injuries.htm

March 24, 2006

More water deaths

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 11:14 am

By Kevin Wadlow
Senior Staff Writer
kwadlow@keynoter.com

Posted-Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:10 AM EST

Coroner says reasons vary for recent spate

The number of visitors dying in Keys waters either while snorkeling or diving continues to rise this year.

Two people died while snorkeling off the Keys over the weekend, bringing to six the number of deaths on local waters in 2006 - a number higher than a typical annual total of such deaths.

Three of those deaths - none involving the use of scuba gear - occurred within the past eight days.

Friday, a 65-year-old man died while on a commercial snorkeling trip near Rock Key, off Key West.

The man, believed to be visiting from out of state, was found floating face-down during a morning reef trip. He was pulled out of the water by crew on a second dive boat. Despite rescue attempts on the six-mile trip to shore, he was pronounced dead on arrival.

The name of the victim and other details were not released pending completion of a U.S. Coast Guard investigation.

The next day, a deepwater spearfisherman died while free-diving to the Thunderbolt shipwreck off Marathon. Ivan Morffi, 29, of Miami was diving with friends when he disappeared. His body was recovered from the bottom, 120 feet down.

On March 15, a 47-year-old woman from Ohio died while diving off a Key Largo snorkel boat.

“Most people who go snorkeling are not at high risk for drowning,” said Dr. Michael Hunter, Monroe County’s medical examiner.

In cases where a middle-aged visitor dies while on a snorkel trip, Hunter said, “Heart disease is often a contributing factor. Many of these people never knew they had heart disease, and the sudden increase in exertion put them at risk.”

The victim may die of a heart attack, or the incident could contribute to a drowning, he said.

“Water is unforgiving,” said Dr. Ernest Campbell of Ono Island, Ala., who runs a dive-medicine Web site, http://www.Scuba-Doc.com. “People start having trouble, then they run short of breath and they can’t do what they need to do to keep their heads above water.”

Snorkeling and diving are physical activities that can trigger a heart attack in people with pre-existing conditions or who are seriously out of shape, he said.

“It’s not much different from somebody deciding to go out and run a mile,” Campbell said. “Your mind is making a commitment your body can’t keep.”

Saturday’s death of Morffi falls into a different category, Hunter said.

“These [free-divers] tend to be younger and physically fit with much more experience in the water,” he said. “But they may make repetitive dives to extreme depths.”

That can cause a buildup of carbon dioxide, which leads to oxygen deprivation - and possible blackouts. “If that happens, especially at depth, drowning follows,” he said.

To P or Not to P: Why Use a P Value, Anyway?

Filed under: Uncategorizedscubadoc @ 10:59 am

What is a P Value?

When doing a study, research problem or trying to decide if some finding is significant - statisticians use a method called the “P value”. P is short for probability: the probability of getting something more extreme than your result, when there is no effect in the population. To get statistical significance, you assume there is no effect in the population. Then you see if the value you get for the effect in your sample is the sort of value you would expect for no effect in the population. If the value you get is unlikely for no effect, you conclude there is an effect, and you say the result is “statistically significant”.

Andrew J. Vickers, PhD, in Medscape, has written an article that might be of interest to many physicians and people interested in trying to decide whether or not a particular study is of any true value. We hear a lot these days of “evidence based studies” with findings that are statistically significant and not “anecdotal”. This might apply to the use of a treatment modality such as hyperbaric oxygenation for conditions that might show a benefit for several patients but after rigorous statistical analysis - fail to have a significant “P value” and not really have a beneficial effect across the board.

Dr. Vickers writes humorously of his statistical obsessions in a manner to point out the ramifications of a statistically significant P value. The article is paraphrased below.

“Going home each night, he has a choice between a busy road or winding through the backstreets of Brooklyn. Being statistically obsessed, he records how long each route takes on a number of occasions and calculates means and standard deviations. He needs to know the quickest route and conducts a statistical analysis of his times: it turns out that the travel time for the busy road is shorter, but the difference between routes is not statistically significant (P = .4). Nonetheless, it would still seem sensible to take what is likely to be the quicker route home, even though it hasn’t been proved that it will get him there fastest.

So, he now decides to get more information and spends 2 years randomly selecting a route home and recording times. After analyzing the data, there is strong evidence that going home via the busy road is faster (P = .0001), but not by much (it saves me 57.3 seconds on average). So he decides that, he’ll wind along the backstreets, simply because it is a more pleasant journey and well worth the extra minute. Pragmatic?

If P values should determine our actions, as most think; in the case of a drug or hyperbaric clinical trial, for example, we say: “P The most important thing to remember about P values is that they are used to test hypotheses. This sounds obvious, but it is all too easily forgotten. A good example is the widespread practice of citing P values for baseline differences between groups in a randomized trial. The hypothesis being tested here is whether there are real differences between groups. Yet we know that groups were randomly selected, so any differences in characteristics such as age or sex must be due to chance alone.

Science is often said to be about checking ideas, but in many cases this is not what we want to do at all. When he needed to get home quickly, he wasn’t interested in proving which was the quickest way home, he just needed to figure out which route would do what he needed -to get him to an appointment on time (Pragmatism?). Moreover, even when we do want to test ideas, the conclusion is often an insufficient reason for action. He eventually proved that using the busy road was quickest but decided to choose a different route on the basis of considerations — pleasure and quality of life — that formed no part of the hypothesis test.

An even more difficult problem is when our P value is > .05, that is, when we have failed to prove our hypothesis. This is often interpreted as proof that our hypothesis is false. Using this interpretation might withhold beneficial therapy to many. Such an interpretation is not only incorrect, but Dr. Vickers feels that it can also be dangerous; he will discuss this in a future column.”

Andrew J. Vickers, PhD, Assistant Attending Research Methodologist, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

http://snipurl.com/ns0f

==========================================================================
Dr. Omar Sanchez, Buenos Aires physician, has the following quotation that seems apropos here:
“Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.”

He also sends us a citation for an article in the Spectrum, a journal of the National Cancer Institute titled “What’s the Rush? The Dissemination and Adoption of Preliminary Research Results”

http://jncicancerspectrum.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/jnci;98/6/372

This article emphacizes the gamble of taking early returns from studies and applying the good results as a treatment modality.

Reactivated and Maintained by Centrum Nurkowe Aquanaut Diving